The Birth And Sudden Rise Of The USDL
. THE BIRTH AND SUDDEN RISE OF THE UNITED STATES DEFENSE LEAGUE.
The United States Defense League was formed in February 2012 with the full endorsement of the English Defence League leader Tommy Robinson, as the old regime was stagnant and non-productive in the cause to fight radical Islam in the USA. This goes against the grain of what the Defense Leagues are all about. At this point, Islam is not as big a problem in the United States as it is in England or in Continental Europe, but we are now experiencing the horror of honor killings, crimes committed by assailants while wearing burqas, sharia in our courtrooms, and more.
As the muslim population in America grows, so will all of these things.
Our main goal is to educate and unite Americans on the "True" Islam by way of demonstrations and public meetings.
We have started a petition asking for citizens to sign on to ban the burqas and niqabs in public buildings in the United States. There are also serious concerns over security in public places.
Since beginning in February, the USDL has attended 2 events. The first was an educational event to bring awareness on Halal Food and Sharia Law. The USDL attended this event on April 8th. This was very successful and the public was very receptive to our information.
We were also recently invited to attend a protest against the Shura Council of North America's talk on "Dispelling The Myths About Sharia Law" in Anaheim, California on 4/17. Now what does ICNA stand for....you can ponder all you like and you will never guess, as Islamists love hiding behind acronyms, it stands for "ISLAMIC CIRCLE OF NORTH AMERICA"
The key speaker was Dr. Tariq Ramadan, whose grandfather Hassan al Banna founded the Muslim Brotherhood in 1928. While Ramadan's visa was revoked by the US State Department in 2004, orders were signed in 2010 permitting his return. With Ramadan's views and ties, he has been banned from several countries, but the bans have been lifted here in America at this point.
The leader of the USDL, Renee Aldrich and one of the Co-founders, Carrie Aldrich flew out to California from the East Coast to protest this event and were greeted by around 30 concerned and dedicated fellow patriots, while the other Co-founder, Linda Conn made the travel arrangements and gathered much needed information regarding the event.
When you consider that this was all arranged with less than 24 hours' notice, it was an excellent turn out.
At the protest, we were cursed at, photographed, told to go home, obscene gestures were made, but what was most astonishing was when one person attending the 'EVENT' rolled his window down and yelled "GO HAMAS."
USDL brochures on Sharia Law and informational leaflets on the event were passed out by the USDL and the group that was hosting the event. These were passed out to people on the streets as well as people attending the event. Most people were very interested in the information and some seemed genuinely concerned about the event being held inside the hotel.
The USDL feels that Sharia Law is incompatible with the US Constitution and our democracy. Neither freedom nor democracy are allowed under Sharia law, and it therefore threatens the freedoms and values of every person living in the United States.
As one USDL member said, "We have seen the start of the Islamisation of Europe and have see the rise of Islamisation in America and need to stop this cancer before it spreads too far here as well."
We of the USDL are passionately dedicated to educating and uniting Americans on the dangers of Islam.
We do not tolerate racism or violence of any kind, and look forward to having you join us at our next public appearance.
.
posted by Nilk @ 7:33 PM
11 Comments:
http://www.loonwatch.com/2012/05/the-united-states-of-america-defence-league-the-crusade-begins/
Good to see at least one website out there shows the USDL's true colours. One uses links and evidence, you use fear mongering to keep your flock of idiots under the spell of stupidity.
LOL. Keep up the good wood work.
Um, Anon, your loonwatch link is railing against the USADL, not the USDL.
You see, or rather you don't, is that people all over the place are seeing all the activist muslim groups (as opposed to the non-activist groups, I guess), and the ceaseless pushing and whining about being victims.
There are little groups popping up all over the world, in so many different countries that it's difficult to keep track of them all.
If you think there's nothing wrong with sharia law, which is integral to the muslim culture, then I guess you have no problem with the concept of slaying infidels where you find them for example.
You would also take no issue with a death sentence for apostasy and women proving their modesty by swathing themselves in shapeless clothing a la Afghanistan.
But, because I support the idea of pushing back against sharia and am happy to pass word around of groups such as the USDL and USADL and many others you think that I'm the bigot.
Please remind me again which parts of sharia law can be modified to fit with Western Law, because I always thought that sharia law was allah's law for all men for all time and as such is not negotiable.
Where do you fit in the sharia scheme of things?
EDL,USDL, USADL,it doesn't matter, you are all cut from the same cloth.
"If you think there's nothing wrong with sharia law, which is integral to the muslim culture, then I guess you have no problem with the concept of slaying infidels where you find them for example. "
Dear God, see, this is why people laugh at you, because you are an out and out liar.
This is sura 2, verse 191, which you have taken out of context so you can continue with your lying.
http://seekersguidance.org/ans-blog/2010/06/14/slay-the-polytheists-wherever-you-find-them-the-need-for-recourse-to-sound-scholarship/
Thats just a basic summation, and even that is nowhere near what you try to imply.
"You would also take no issue with a death sentence for apostasy and women proving their modesty by swathing themselves in shapeless clothing a la Afghanistan."
Oh please, it's now about the Afghan women is it? You didn't care about them before you invaded them, killed their kids, wrecked the country even worse then before it's now "won't someone think of the women!!!!!"
Tell me, how much work have you done with the 40% of Australian women who have experienced violence or sexual assault? how much work have you done to stop the slaughter of thousands of aborted babies? And you want people to believe you actually want to help afghan women?
"Please remind me again which parts of sharia law can be modified to fit with Western Law, because I always thought that sharia law was allah's law for all men for all time and as such is not negotiable.
Where do you fit in the sharia scheme of things?"
Again, you are too one eyed to see past your own bigotry. Sharia Law is fluidic, it can be moulded to the needs of society of the day. A lot of sharia law IS'NT EVEN DERIVED FROM THE QURAN. Western Road laws can be considered Sharia. People spend years studying Sharia law, and like studying any law of any nation, takes years to understand, and here you are thinking you know something about it.
You know the funny thing, people like you would think hand amputation is barbaric, until they steal your belongings.
If I've taken it out of context, why are so many infidels being attacked in the name of islam? Why is it okay for muslims to use the quran to justify the murder of christians in Africa and the Middle East?
As for it being about the Afghan women, who's being disingenous now? I'm not one of those women who call themselves feminists and then shut up when women in other cultures are being abused.
I'm just a woman, and as one of the 40% who's experienced violence or sexual assault, I think you have no idea what you're talking about when it comes to me.
Where is sharia law fluid again? In the bit that where it talks of muslims laying low and obeying the laws of the land they're in until they have primacy?
Your job as a muslim (according the a Hizb ut Tahrir talk I attended) is to spread islam. Islam is to rule the world, is that not correct?
To do so, it will have to supercede other laws in other lands, since Australian law forbids things like discrimination on religious grounds. Your religion covers dress, food preparation, how to worship, when to worship, how to deal with those of other beliefs, and
how those with other beliefs should act when in your company.
Excuse me? I should be living according to sharia law? I'll be sure to tell my boss that I need to take several prayer breaks a day. He'll love that.
So when did you revert again?
Ultimately it doesn't matter tome where sharia came from. What matters to me is that I shouldn't have to consider living my life according to it in Australia or any other western country.
I shouldn't have to worry about whether the dead animal I eat is killed in accordance to what is lawful for you.
I shouldn't have to worry about whether I'm dressed in a manner so that people like you won't think that not only am I a najis kuffar (which I already knew), but you put me in the box marked whore.
As kuffar I am in your eyes filthy.
And aborted babies is a nice touch there. What are you doing about them?
I'll be seeing you at the Life Dinner next month, I guess.
I look forward to it.
And remember, allah's law takes precedence over infidel's law.
Except when it's convenient not to.
Oh, and as for your contention that all the different groups are cut from the same cloth, here.
Have an argument and lighten up.
I note you did'nt actually answer anything I put up.
Then you tried to make yourself the victim.
Nice work.
Good Luck in your "endeavors" in spreading your version of what Islam is all about.
argue all you want anon but at the end of the day your prophet that you worship and adore was nothing but a pedophile. He married a girl at six and had sex with her at nine. Says so in the koran. Probaly explains why muslim men cover their woman from head to toe but walk around with boners chasing boys...
" Anonymous said...
argue all you want anon but at the end of the day your prophet that you worship and adore was nothing but a pedophile. He married a girl at six and had sex with her at nine. "
"Says so in the koran."
The age or even the name of Hazrat Ayesha (ra) is not even mentioned in the Quran.
Try to get your sources from somewhere else other than Robert Spencers arse.
Oh dear, anon. You forget.... Bukhari was the one who said that Aisha was 6 when she married Mohammad.
Islam is not just the quran, it's also the hadiths.
In any case, if Bukhari is wrong, why did Khomeini lower the age of marriage for women [sic] to nine when he got power if there was no islamic precedent? He was very learned in islam, so surely he had grounds for that one.
In any case, Robert Spencer quotes islamic sources.
Nice try, but your previous poster said it was in the Quran.
It is'nt, and got called out on it, so you tried to move the goal posts.
Fail.
"In any case, if Bukhari is wrong, why did Khomeini lower the age of marriage for women [sic] to nine when he got power if there was no islamic precedent? He was very learned in islam, so surely he had grounds for that one."
Khomeini is Shi'ite, the Quran is Sunni based. they apply things differently on theological grounds. In islam puberty is the pre-requsite.
any way, here is some info not from dubious sources.
http://www.muslim.org/islam/aisha-age.htm
"In any case, Robert Spencer quotes islamic sources."
Sorry i thought you were running a blog and not a comedy channel.
Just ban the Muslim sodomite already.
Post a Comment
<< Home